Curating Training Data For Incremental Re-Training Of A Predictive Model

ABSTRACT

In general, embodiments of the present invention provide systems, methods and computer readable media for curating a training data set to ensure that training data being updated continuously from a data reservoir of verified possible training examples remain an accurate, high-quality representation of the distribution of data that are being input to a predictive model for processing.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.14/918,362, titled “CURATING TRAINING DATA FOR INCREMENTAL RE-TRAININGOF A PREDICTIVE MODEL,” filed Oct. 20, 2015, which claims the benefit ofpriority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/069,692, titled“CURATING TRAINING DATA FOR INCREMENTAL RE-TRAINING OF A PREDICTIVEMODEL,” and filed Oct. 28, 2014, the contents of which are herebyincorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

FIELD

Embodiments of the invention relate, generally, to curating trainingdata used for incremental re-training of a predictive model viasupervised learning.

BACKGROUND

Current methods for increasing the likelihood of successful incrementalre-training of a predictive model exhibit a plurality of problems thatmake current systems insufficient, ineffective and/or the like. Throughapplied effort, ingenuity, and innovation, solutions to improve suchmethods have been realized and are described in connection withembodiments of the present invention.

SUMMARY

Data being continuously sampled from a data stream is an example ofdynamic data. Analysis of such dynamic data typically is based ondata-driven statistical models that can be generated using machinelearning. The statistical distribution of the set of training datainstances used to derive a predictive model using supervised learningshould be an accurate representation of the distribution of unlabeleddata that will be input to the model for processing. Additionally, thecomposition of a training data set should be structured to provide asmuch information as possible to the model. However, dynamic data isinherently inconsistent. Data quality fluctuations may affect theperformance of a statistical model, and, in some cases when the dataquality and/or statistical distribution of the data has changed overtime, the statistical model may have to be replaced by a different modelthat more closely fits the changed data.

Obtaining a set of accurately distributed, high-quality training datainstances for derivation of a model is difficult, time-consuming, and/orexpensive. Once a model has been derived from an initial training dataset, being able to perform real time monitoring of the performance ofthe model as well as to perform data quality assessments on dynamic dataas it is being collected can enable the model to be adaptedincrementally to fluctuations of quality and/or statistical distributionof dynamic data, thus reducing the cost involved in repeatedly replacingthe model.

In general, embodiments of the present invention provide herein systems,methods and computer readable media for curating a training data set toensure that training data being updated continuously from a datareservoir of verified possible training examples remain an accurate,high-quality representation of the distribution of data that are beinginput to a predictive model for processing. A curated training data setthus will ensure a high probability of success for adaptive incrementalre-training of the model to improve model performance.

The details of one or more embodiments of the subject matter describedin this specification are set forth in the accompanying drawings and thedescription below. Other features, aspects, and advantages of thesubject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings,and the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)

Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will nowbe made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn toscale, and wherein:

FIG. 1 illustrates an example system configured to implement an adaptivecrowd-trained learning framework that includes a curated training dataset that is adapted for accurate representation of dynamic data analysisin accordance with some embodiments discussed herein;

FIG. 2 is an illustration of an example of the different effects ofupdating an exemplary training data set for a binary classification taskusing labeled data samples that have been respectively chosen fromeither active learning or dynamic data quality assessment in accordancewith some embodiments discussed herein;

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of an example method for automatic updating ofa training data set based on incremental re-training of a predictivemodel in accordance with some embodiments discussed herein; and

FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic block diagram of circuitry that can beincluded in a computing device, such as a training data manager module,in accordance with some embodiments discussed herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter withreference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not allembodiments of the invention are shown. Indeed, this invention may beembodied in many different forms and should not be construed as beinglimited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodimentsare provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legalrequirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.

As described herein, system components can be communicatively coupled toone or more of each other. Though the components are described as beingseparate or distinct, two or more of the components may be combined intoa single process or routine. The component functional descriptionsprovided herein including separation of responsibility for distinctfunctions is by way of example. Other groupings or other divisions offunctional responsibilities can be made as necessary or in accordancewith design preferences.

As used herein, the terms “data,” “content,” “information” and similarterms may be used interchangeably to refer to data capable of beingcaptured, transmitted, received, displayed and/or stored in accordancewith various example embodiments. Thus, use of any such terms should notbe taken to limit the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Further, wherea computing device is described herein to receive data from anothercomputing device, the data may be received directly from the anothercomputing device or may be received indirectly via one or moreintermediary computing devices, such as, for example, one or moreservers, relays, routers, network access points, base stations, and/orthe like. Similarly, where a computing device is described herein tosend data to another computing device, the data may be sent directly tothe another computing device or may be sent indirectly via one or moreintermediary computing devices, such as, for example, one or moreservers, relays, routers, network access points, base stations, and/orthe like.

Data being continuously sampled from a data stream is an example ofdynamic data. In some embodiments, the data stream may be generated froma data store while, in some alternative embodiments, the data stream mayrepresent data collected from a variety of online sources (e.g.,websites, blogs, and social media). Analysis of such dynamic datatypically is based on data-driven statistical models that can begenerated using machine learning. One type of machine learning issupervised learning, in which a statistical predictive model is derivedbased on a training data set of examples representing a particularmodeling task to be performed by the model. An exemplary particular taskmay be a binary classification task in which the predictive model (abinary classifier) returns a judgment as to which of two categories aninput data instance most likely belongs. Using supervised learning, thebinary classifier is derived based on a set of labeled training dataconsisting of data instances, each instance being associated with averified label identifying the category to which the instance belongs.Typically, the labels associated with the training data set of exampleshave been verified by at least one reliable source of truth (an oracle,hereinafter) to ensure their accuracy. For example, in embodiments, anoracle may be a crowd, a flat file of data verification resultspreviously received from one or more oracles, and/or data verificationsoftware.

The statistical distribution of the set of training data instancesshould be an accurate representation of the distribution of unlabeleddata that will be input to the model for processing. Additionally, thecomposition of a training data set should be structured to provide asmuch information as possible to the model being derived. Obtaining a setof accurately distributed, high-quality training data instances (i.e.,examples that are non-obvious or edge cases that could improve modelperformance through training) for derivation of a model is difficult,time-consuming, and/or expensive. For example, a training data set for aclassification task should be balanced to ensure that examples of onecategory are not more frequent within the training data set thanexamples of the other categories, but assembling this distribution maybe difficult if the frequency of one of the categories in a general datapopulation is relatively rare. In a second example, derivation of ade-duplication classifier (i.e., a classifier that detects duplicates)using supervised learning requires a training data set that includesexamples of duplicates as well as examples of non-duplicates, andobtaining enough high-quality examples of duplicates from a generalpopulation is particularly difficult.

Dynamic data is inherently inconsistent. The quality of the data sourcesmay vary, the quality of the data collection methods may vary, and, inthe case of data being collected continuously from a data stream, theoverall quality and statistical distribution of the data itself may varyover time. Data quality fluctuations may affect the performance of astatistical model, and, in some cases when the data quality and/orstatistical distribution of the data has changed over time, theperformance of a statistical model may degrade so that the current modelmay have to be replaced by a different model that more closely fits thechanged data. Once a model has been derived from an initial trainingdata set, being able to perform real time monitoring of the performanceof the model as well as to perform data quality assessments on dynamicdata as it is being collected can enable an instantiated model to beadapted incrementally to fluctuations of quality and/or statisticaldistribution of dynamic data, thus reducing the cost involved inrepeatedly replacing the model.

As such, and according to some example embodiments, the systems andmethods described herein are therefore configured to curate a trainingdata set to ensure that training data being updated continuously from adata reservoir of verified possible training examples remain anaccurate, high-quality representation of the distribution of data thatare being input to a predictive model for processing. Thus, as thetraining data are being adapted to fluctuations in quality andcomposition of the dynamic data being processed, the incrementalre-training of a predictive model using a curated training data set willensure a high probability of success in improving the model performance.

An adaptive crowd-trained learning framework for automatically buildingand maintaining a predictive statistical model may be used to performanalysis of dynamic data. An exemplary adaptive crowd-trained frameworkis described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/920,251,entitled “Processing Dynamic Data Using An Adaptive Crowd-TrainedLearning System,” filed on Dec. 23, 2013, and which is incorporatedherein in its entirety.

Once a predictive model is trained using an initial training data set,the framework monitors the performance of the model as new input dataare processed and leverages active learning and an oracle to generatefeedback about the changing data. Based on the feedback, currentexamples of the input data being processed are selected to be given truelabels by the oracle. The resulting verified examples may be stored in adata reservoir, and the training data set used to derive the model maybe updated continuously using these stored high-quality examples. Inembodiments, the training data set is curated to ensure that incrementalre-training of the model using training data that are updated from thedata reservoir will ensure a high probability of success in improvingthe model performance.

For clarity, the inventions will be described for embodiments in whichcurating training data for incremental re-training of a predictive modelis included within an adaptive crowd-trained learning framework.However, it is to be understood that the inventions are not to belimited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications andother embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of theappended claims.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example system 100 configured to implement anadaptive crowd-trained learning framework that includes a curatedtraining data set which is adapted for accurate representation ofdynamic data analysis. In embodiments, system 100 comprises a predictivemodel 120 (e.g., a classifier) that has been derived using supervisedlearning based on a set of training data 180, and that is configured togenerate a judgment about the input data 105 in response to receiving afeature representation of the input data 105; an input data analysiscomponent 110 for generating a feature representation of the input data105; a quality assurance component 140 for assessment of the quality ofthe input data 105 and of the quality of the judgments of the predictivemodel 120; an active learning component 130 to facilitate the generationand maintenance of optimized training data 120; at least one oracle 150for providing a true label for input data 105 that has been selected asa possible training example by the active learning component 130 and/orthe quality assurance component 140; a labeled data reservoir 160 forstoring the labeled input data 105 received from the oracle 150; and atraining data manager 170 for curating the set of training data 180 byupdating the set of training data 180 using a subset of the labeledinput data instances stored in the labeled data reservoir 160.

In embodiments, the predictive model 120 may be derived throughsupervised learning based on an initial training data set 180 which, insome embodiments, has been generated automatically within the adaptivecrowd-trained learning framework 100. In some embodiments, one or morehigh-quality initial training data sets may be generated automaticallyfrom a pool of unlabeled data instances. In some embodiments, theunlabeled data instances are dynamic data that have been collected fromat least one data stream during at least one time window. In someembodiments, the collected data instances are multi-dimensional data,where each data instance is assumed to be described by a set ofattributes (i.e., features hereinafter). In some embodiments, thesampled data instances are sent to an oracle 150 for labeling.

In embodiments, new unlabeled data instances 105, sharing the particulartype of the examples in the training data set 180, are input to thesystem 100 for processing by the predictive model 120. For example, insome embodiments, each new data instance 105 may includemulti-dimensional data collected from one or more online sourcesdescribing a particular business (e.g., a restaurant, a spa), and thepredictive model 120 may be a classifier that returns a judgment as towhich of a set of categories the business belongs.

In embodiments, the predictive model 120 generates a judgment (e.g., apredicted label identifying a category if the model is a classifier) inresponse to receiving a feature representation of an unlabeled inputdata instance 105. In some embodiments, the feature representation isgenerated during input data analysis 110 using a distribution-basedfeature analysis as described, for example, in U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 14/038,661 entitled “Dynamic Clustering for Streaming Data,”filed on Sep. 16, 2013, and which is incorporated herein in itsentirety.

In some embodiments, the judgment generated by the predictive model 120includes a confidence value. For example, in some embodiments in whichthe predictive model 120 is performing a classification task, theconfidence value included with a classification judgment is a scorerepresenting the distance in decision space of the judgment from thetask decision boundary. Classification judgments that are more certainare associated with higher confidence scores because those judgments areat greater distances in decision space from the task decision boundary.

In some embodiments, an input data instance 105 and its associatedjudgment may be selected as a possible training example by an activelearning component 130. Active learning, as described, for example, inSettles, Burr (2009), “Active Learning Literature Survey”, ComputerSciences Technical Report 1648, University of Wisconsin-13 Madison, is asemi-supervised learning process in which the distribution of trainingdata set instances can be adjusted to optimally represent a machinelearning problem. For example, a machine-learning algorithm may achievegreater accuracy with fewer training labels if the training data setinstances are chosen to provide maximum information about the problem.Referring to a classification task example, input data instances thatresult in classifier judgments that are closer to the decision boundary(e.g., judgments that are associated with lower confidence values aspreviously described) are more likely to provide maximum informationabout the classification task and thus may be recognized by an activelearning component 130 as possible training examples.

In some embodiments, an active learning component 130 may generate anaccuracy assessment by calculating an accuracy assessment scorecombining model prediction accuracy and data quality. In someembodiments, an accuracy assessment may include identifying modelprediction errors (e.g., a classifier model generates a predictedjudgment with a high confidence value, but the judgment assigns theinput data to the wrong category).

In some embodiments, selection of a possible training example may beimplemented by a quality assurance component 140 that monitors thequality of the predictive model performance as well as the quality ofthe input data being processed. In some embodiments, monitoring qualitymay be based on at least in part on comparing a calculated quality scoreto an accuracy threshold representing the system's desired accuracy. Insome embodiments, the calculated quality score may include an accuracyassessment calculated by an active learning component 130.

In embodiments, selected possible training examples are sent to anoracle 150 for verification, which includes the assignment of a truelabel to the input data instance. The resulting labeled input data 155are stored in a labeled data reservoir 160. In some embodiments, thelabeled data reservoir 160 grows continuously, and includes all possibletraining data samples that have been respectively selected by any one ofmultiple sources (e.g., the active learning component 130 and thequality assurance component 140 of system 100, one-off cleaning tasks,and/or external collections of verified labeled data) for differentpurposes. The choices of quantity and/or types of sources for possibletraining data samples are not critical to the invention.

In embodiments, the training data manager 170 may update the trainingdata 180 by selecting, from a labeled data reservoir 160, an optimalsubset of training data samples to use in a training data 180 update. Inembodiments in which the input data instances are multi-dimensionaldata, the criteria used by the training data manager 170 for selectingthe optimal subset of training data samples may be based at least inpart on the feature analysis used to generate the initial training dataset used to derive the model. In some embodiments, the feature analysisincludes clustering collected unlabeled data instances into homogeneousgroups across multiple dimensions using an unsupervised learningapproach that is dependent on the distribution of the input data asdescribed, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/038,661.In these embodiments, the criteria used by the training data manager 170may be based on attributes of a single cluster over time to ensuremaintenance of model fidelity over time and/or maintenance of anaccurate class balance for classification tasks. In some embodiments,the training data manager 170 selection criteria may be used to updatethe feature extraction criteria implemented by the input data analysiscomponent 110.

FIG. 2 is an illustration 200 of an example of the different effects ofupdating an exemplary training data set for a binary classification taskusing labeled data samples that have been respectively chosen fromeither active learning or dynamic data quality assessment. A model(i.e., a binary classifier) assigns a predicted judgment value 210 todata sample; a data sample assigned a judgment value that is close toeither 0 or 1 has been determined with certainty by the classifier tobelong to one or the other of two classes. A judgment value of 0.5represents a situation in which the classification decision was notcertain (i.e., the predicted judgment is close to the decision boundary215 for the classification task).

The dashed curve 240 represents the relative frequencies of new trainingdata samples that would be added to a training data set for this binaryclassification problem by an active learning component. To enhance theperformance of the classifier in situations where the decision wasuncertain, the active learning component would choose the majority ofnew training data samples from input data that resulted in decisionsnear the decision boundary 215.

The solid curve 230 represents the relative frequencies of new trainingdata samples that would be added to the training data set by dynamicquality assessment. Instead of choosing new training data samples basedon the judgment value, in some embodiments, dynamic quality assessmentmay choose the majority of new training data samples based on whetherthey statistically belong in the data reservoir distribution. It alsomay select new training data samples that were classified with certainty(i.e., having a judgment value close to either 0 or 1), but erroneously(e.g., samples in which the predicted judgment from the classifier didnot match the result returned from the oracle).

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of an example method 300 for automatic updatingof a training data set based on incremental re-training of a predictivemodel. For convenience, the method 300 will be described with respect toa system that includes one or more computing devices and performs themethod 300. Specifically, the method will be described with respect toimplementation by training data manager 170 within system 100.

In embodiments, after receiving 305 training data and a current modelderived using the training data, the system selects 310 a set of labeleddata instances from a labeled data reservoir. In some embodiments, thedata in the labeled data reservoir are not included in the trainingdata. As previously described, in some embodiments, a labeled datareservoir includes a pool of possible training data that have beencollected continuously over time from input data being processed by themodel. Each of the data instances in the reservoir has been assigned atrue label (e.g., a verified category identifier for a classificationtask) by a trusted source (i.e., an oracle). In some embodiments, thelabeled reservoir data have been collected as a result of having beenselected, for different purposes, by one of multiple sources (e.g., theactive learning component 130 and the quality assurance component 140 ofsystem 100). For example, referring to the exemplary binaryclassification task 200, active learning may select possible trainingdata instances from input data in which the predicted judgment is closeto the decision boundary (thus providing maximum information about thetask to the model), while dynamic quality assessment may select possibletraining data instances from input data based on a statistical decision.

In embodiments, selecting the set of labeled data instances from thelabeled data reservoir is based on a determination that re-training themodel with updated training data likely will result in improved modelperformance. In some embodiments, this determination is based at leastin part on analyzing the distribution and quality of the training data.For example, in some embodiments in which the predictive model is aclassifier, the selection may be based at least in part on maintenanceand/or improvement of class balance in the training data (e.g., addingtraining examples of rare categories). In a second example, theselection may be based at least in part on adding examples having higherdata quality than the training data. In a third example, the selectionmay be based at least in part on adding examples that have higheraccuracy assessment scores, as previously described. Additionally and/oralternatively, in some embodiments in which curating training data isimplemented within an adaptive dynamic data analysis system (e.g.,system 100), this determination is based on feedback signals receivedfrom one or more components of the system (e.g., the active learningcomponent 130 and the quality assurance component 140) and/or datafreshness (i.e., adding more newer data to a training data set thanolder data).

In embodiments, the system generates 315 at least one candidate trainingdata set by updating the training data using the set of labeled datainstances. In embodiments, updating the training data may includepruning the training data set and replacing removed data with at least asubset of the selected labeled data. In some embodiments, pruning thetraining data set may include removing outliers from the training data.In some embodiments in which the model is a classifier, removingoutliers may be implemented on a per class basis (e.g., removing atraining data sample describing a patient who has been classified ashaving a particular disease but has attributes that are inconsistentwith the attributes describing other patients who have been classifiedas having that disease). Additionally and/or alternatively, updating thetraining data may include pruning outliers from the selected labeleddata before updating the training data.

In some embodiments, the system derives multiple candidate models byderiving each model using differently updated sets of the receivedtraining data. In some embodiments, each of the differently updatedtraining data sets may represent the current training data having beenupdated using a different subset of the selected set of labeled datainstances. In some embodiments, updating the current training data maybe based on a greedy algorithm in which new batches of training datainstances are added incrementally to the training data set. Before eachbatch is added, a test is performed to determine if updating thetraining data by adding the batch will improve the model performance.Additionally and/or alternatively, in some embodiments, updating thecurrent training data may be based on a non-greedy algorithm in which,for example, all the current training data are removed and replaced witha completely new set of training data.

In embodiments, for each candidate updated training data set, the systemderives 320 a candidate model using supervised learning. In embodiments,the system generates 325 an assessment of whether the candidate modelperformance is improved from the current model performance. In someembodiments, generating the assessment includes A/B testing in which thesame set of data is input to the current model and to at least onecandidate model that has been trained using candidate training data andthen comparing the performance of the candidate model to the performanceof the current model. In some embodiments, comparing the performance ofthe current model and a candidate model is implemented bycross-validation.

There are a variety of well-known statistical techniques for comparingresults; the choice of statistical technique for comparing theperformance of models is not critical to the invention.

In some embodiments in which the model performs real time analysis ofinput data from a datastream (e.g., embodiments of dynamic data analysissystem 100), the input datastream may be forked to multiple models sothat A/B testing is implemented in parallel for all the models. Inembodiments, the system updates 320 the training data and instantiates are-trained model in an instance in which the assessment indicates thatre-training the current model using the updated training data results inimproved model performance.

In an instance in which the assessment indicates that a re-trained modelperformance is improved from the current model performance 330, thesystem instantiates 335 the candidate updated training data used toderive the candidate model and the candidate model before the processends 340. In some embodiments in which the training data are notincluded in the labeled data reservoir, instantiating the updatedtraining data includes removing the selected set of labeled datainstances used to update the received training data from the labeleddata reservoir.

The process ends 340 in an instance in which the assessment indicatesthat a candidate model performance is not improved from the currentmodel performance 330.

FIG. 4 shows a schematic block diagram of circuitry 400, some or all ofwhich may be included in, for example, adaptive crowd-trained learningframework system 100. As illustrated in FIG. 4, in accordance with someexample embodiments, circuitry 400 can include various means, such asprocessor 402, memory 404, communications module 406, and/orinput/output module 408. As referred to herein, “module” includeshardware, software and/or firmware configured to perform one or moreparticular functions. In this regard, the means of circuitry 400 asdescribed herein may be embodied as, for example, circuitry, hardwareelements (e.g., a suitably programmed processor, combinational logiccircuit, and/or the like), a computer program product comprisingcomputer-readable program instructions stored on a non-transitorycomputer-readable medium (e.g., memory 404) that is executable by asuitably configured processing device (e.g., processor 402), or somecombination thereof.

Processor 402 may, for example, be embodied as various means includingone or more microprocessors with accompanying digital signalprocessor(s), one or more processor(s) without an accompanying digitalsignal processor, one or more coprocessors, one or more multi-coreprocessors, one or more controllers, processing circuitry, one or morecomputers, various other processing elements including integratedcircuits such as, for example, an ASIC (application specific integratedcircuit) or FPGA (field programmable gate array), or some combinationthereof. Accordingly, although illustrated in FIG. 4 as a singleprocessor, in some embodiments processor 402 comprises a plurality ofprocessors. The plurality of processors may be embodied on a singlecomputing device or may be distributed across a plurality of computingdevices collectively configured to function as circuitry 400. Theplurality of processors may be in operative communication with eachother and may be collectively configured to perform one or morefunctionalities of circuitry 400 as described herein. In an exampleembodiment, processor 402 is configured to execute instructions storedin memory 404 or otherwise accessible to processor 402. Theseinstructions, when executed by processor 402, may cause circuitry 400 toperform one or more of the functionalities of circuitry 400 as describedherein.

Whether configured by hardware, firmware/software methods, or by acombination thereof, processor 402 may comprise an entity capable ofperforming operations according to embodiments of the present inventionwhile configured accordingly. Thus, for example, when processor 402 isembodied as an ASIC, FPGA or the like, processor 402 may comprisespecifically configured hardware for conducting one or more operationsdescribed herein. Alternatively, as another example, when processor 402is embodied as an executor of instructions, such as may be stored inmemory 404, the instructions may specifically configure processor 402 toperform one or more algorithms and operations described herein, such asthose discussed in connection with FIG. 3.

Memory 404 may comprise, for example, volatile memory, non-volatilememory, or some combination thereof. Although illustrated in FIG. 4 as asingle memory, memory 404 may comprise a plurality of memory components.The plurality of memory components may be embodied on a single computingdevice or distributed across a plurality of computing devices. Invarious embodiments, memory 404 may comprise, for example, a hard disk,random access memory, cache memory, flash memory, a compact disc readonly memory (CD-ROM), digital versatile disc read only memory (DVD-ROM),an optical disc, circuitry configured to store information, or somecombination thereof. Memory 404 may be configured to store information,data (including analytics data), applications, instructions, or the likefor enabling circuitry 400 to carry out various functions in accordancewith example embodiments of the present invention. For example, in atleast some embodiments, memory 404 is configured to buffer input datafor processing by processor 402. Additionally or alternatively, in atleast some embodiments, memory 404 is configured to store programinstructions for execution by processor 402. Memory 404 may storeinformation in the form of static and/or dynamic information. Thisstored information may be stored and/or used by circuitry 400 during thecourse of performing its functionalities.

Communications module 406 may be embodied as any device or meansembodied in circuitry, hardware, a computer program product comprisingcomputer readable program instructions stored on a computer readablemedium (e.g., memory 404) and executed by a processing device (e.g.,processor 402), or a combination thereof that is configured to receiveand/or transmit data from/to another device, such as, for example, asecond circuitry 400 and/or the like. In some embodiments,communications module 406 (like other components discussed herein) canbe at least partially embodied as or otherwise controlled by processor402. In this regard, communications module 406 may be in communicationwith processor 402, such as via a bus. Communications module 406 mayinclude, for example, an antenna, a transmitter, a receiver, atransceiver, network interface card and/or supporting hardware and/orfirmware/software for enabling communications with another computingdevice. Communications module 406 may be configured to receive and/ortransmit any data that may be stored by memory 404 using any protocolthat may be used for communications between computing devices.Communications module 406 may additionally or alternatively be incommunication with the memory 404, input/output module 408 and/or anyother component of circuitry 400, such as via a bus.

Input/output module 408 may be in communication with processor 402 toreceive an indication of a user input and/or to provide an audible,visual, mechanical, or other output to a user. Some example visualoutputs that may be provided to a user by circuitry 400 are discussed inconnection with FIG. 1. As such, input/output module 408 may includesupport, for example, for a keyboard, a mouse, a joystick, a display, atouch screen display, a microphone, a speaker, a RFID reader, barcodereader, biometric scanner, and/or other input/output mechanisms. Inembodiments wherein circuitry 400 is embodied as a server or database,aspects of input/output module 408 may be reduced as compared toembodiments where circuitry 400 is implemented as an end-user machine orother type of device designed for complex user interactions. In someembodiments (like other components discussed herein), input/outputmodule 408 may even be eliminated from circuitry 400. Alternatively,such as in embodiments wherein circuitry 400 is embodied as a server ordatabase, at least some aspects of input/output module 408 may beembodied on an apparatus used by a user that is in communication withcircuitry 400. Input/output module 408 may be in communication with thememory 404, communications module 406, and/or any other component(s),such as via a bus. Although more than one input/output module and/orother component can be included in circuitry 400, only one is shown inFIG. 4 to avoid overcomplicating the drawing (like the other componentsdiscussed herein).

Training data manager module 410 may also or instead be included andconfigured to perform the functionality discussed herein related to thetraining data curation discussed above. In some embodiments, some or allof the functionality of training data curation may be performed byprocessor 402. In this regard, the example processes and algorithmsdiscussed herein can be performed by at least one processor 402 and/ortraining data manager module 410. For example, non-transitory computerreadable media can be configured to store firmware, one or moreapplication programs, and/or other software, which include instructionsand other computer-readable program code portions that can be executedto control each processor (e.g., processor 402 and/or training datamanager module 410) of the components of system 100 to implement variousoperations, including the examples shown above. As such, a series ofcomputer-readable program code portions are embodied in one or morecomputer program products and can be used, with a computing device,server, and/or other programmable apparatus, to producemachine-implemented processes.

Any such computer program instructions and/or other type of code may beloaded onto a computer, processor or other programmable apparatus'scircuitry to produce a machine, such that the computer, processor otherprogrammable circuitry that execute the code on the machine create themeans for implementing various functions, including those describedherein.

It is also noted that all or some of the information presented by theexample displays discussed herein can be based on data that is received,generated and/or maintained by one or more components of system 100. Insome embodiments, one or more external systems (such as a remote cloudcomputing and/or data storage system) may also be leveraged to provideat least some of the functionality discussed herein.

As described above in this disclosure, aspects of embodiments of thepresent invention may be configured as methods, mobile devices, backendnetwork devices, and the like.

Accordingly, embodiments may comprise various means including entirelyof hardware or any combination of software and hardware. Furthermore,embodiments may take the form of a computer program product on at leastone non-transitory computer-readable storage medium havingcomputer-readable program instructions (e.g., computer software)embodied in the storage medium. Any suitable computer-readable storagemedium may be utilized including non-transitory hard disks, CD-ROMs,flash memory, optical storage devices, or magnetic storage devices.

Embodiments of the present invention have been described above withreference to block diagrams and flowchart illustrations of methods,apparatuses, systems and computer program products. It will beunderstood that each block of the circuit diagrams and process flowdiagrams, and combinations of blocks in the circuit diagrams and processflowcharts, respectively, can be implemented by various means includingcomputer program instructions. These computer program instructions maybe loaded onto a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, orother programmable data processing apparatus, such as processor 402and/or training data manager module 410 discussed above with referenceto FIG. 4, to produce a machine, such that the computer program productincludes the instructions which execute on the computer or otherprogrammable data processing apparatus create a means for implementingthe functions specified in the flowchart block or blocks.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in acomputer-readable storage device (e.g., memory 404) that can direct acomputer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function ina particular manner, such that the instructions stored in thecomputer-readable storage device produce an article of manufactureincluding computer-readable instructions for implementing the functiondiscussed herein. The computer program instructions may also be loadedonto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to causea series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or otherprogrammable apparatus to produce a computer-implemented process suchthat the instructions that execute on the computer or other programmableapparatus provide steps for implementing the functions discussed herein.

Accordingly, blocks of the block diagrams and flowchart illustrationssupport combinations of means for performing the specified functions,combinations of steps for performing the specified functions and programinstruction means for performing the specified functions. It will alsobe understood that each block of the circuit diagrams and processflowcharts, and combinations of blocks in the circuit diagrams andprocess flowcharts, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-basedcomputer systems that perform the specified functions or steps, orcombinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions

Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forthherein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which theseinventions pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in theforegoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is tobe understood that the inventions are not to be limited to the specificembodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments areintended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a genericand descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.

1. A computer-implemented method for adaptively improving theperformance of a current predictive model, the method comprising:selecting a set of labeled data instances from a labeled data reservoir,the labeled data reservoir comprising a pool of possible training data,wherein selecting the set of labeled data instances is based on adetermination that re-training a current predictive model with updatedtraining data likely will result in improved model performance;generating a candidate model using at least one candidate training dataset generated based at least in part on a received training data set andthe set of labeled data instances; in an instance in which a performanceof the candidate model is improved from a performance of the currentpredictive model, instantiating the candidate training data set and thecandidate model. 2-13. (canceled)
 14. A computer program product, storedon a non-transitory computer readable medium, comprising instructionsthat when executed on one or more computers cause the one or morecomputers to perform operations comprising: selecting a set of labeleddata instances from a labeled data reservoir, the labeled data reservoircomprising a pool of possible training data, wherein selecting the setof labeled data instances is based on a determination that re-training acurrent predictive model with updated training data likely will resultin improved model performance; generating a candidate model using atleast one candidate training data set generated based at least in parton a received training data set and the set of labeled data instances;in an instance in which a performance of the candidate model is improvedfrom a performance of the current predictive model, instantiating thecandidate training data set and the candidate model.
 15. The computerprogram product of claim 14, wherein the labeled data reservoircomprises data that have been collected continuously over time frominput data being processed by the current predictive model.
 16. Thecomputer program product of claim 14, wherein the set of labeled datainstances is not included in the received training data set, and whereineach labeled data instance is associated with a true label representingthe data instance.
 17. The computer program product of claim 16, whereinthe determination is based at least in part on a distribution andquality of the training data set.
 18. The computer program product ofclaim 17, wherein the current predictive model is a classifierpredicting to which of a set of predictive categories an input datainstance belongs, wherein a true label associated with a labeled datainstance identifies the predictive category to which the labeled datainstance belongs, and wherein selecting the set of labeled datainstances from the labeled data reservoir is based at least in part onmaintaining a class balance within the training data.
 19. The computerprogram product of claim 14, wherein generating the candidate trainingdata comprises identifying and removing outlier instances.
 20. Thecomputer program product of claim 19, wherein the current predictivemodel is a classifier predicting to which of a set of predictivecategories an input data instance belongs, and wherein selecting the setof labeled data instances from the labeled data reservoir comprisesidentifying and removing outlier instances in one predictive category.21. The computer program product of claim 14, wherein the labeled datareservoir comprises labeled data instances that are received frommultiple sources, and wherein selecting a labeled data instance from theset of labeled data instances comprises: selecting the labeled datainstance in an instance in which a source of the labeled data instancematches with a pre-determined source.
 22. The computer program productof claim 14, wherein generating at least one candidate training data setis based on a greedy algorithm, the generating comprising: generating afirst candidate training data set by adding a first subset of thelabeled data instances to the training data; and generating a secondcandidate training data set by adding a second subset of the labeleddata instances to the first candidate training data set.
 23. Thecomputer program product of claim 14, wherein generating at least onecandidate training data set is based on a non-greedy algorithm, thegenerating comprising: replacing the training data with a subset of thelabeled data instances.
 24. (canceled)
 25. The computer program productof claim 24, wherein generating the assessment comprises calculating across-validation between the candidate model performance and the currentpredictive model performance.
 26. The computer program product of claim24, wherein there are multiple candidate models, and wherein generatingthe assessment for each of the multiple candidate models is implementedin parallel.
 27. A system, comprising: one or more computers and one ormore storage devices storing instructions that are operable, whenexecuted by the one or more computers, to cause the one or morecomputers to perform operations comprising: selecting a set of labeleddata instances from a labeled data reservoir, the labeled data reservoircomprising a pool of possible training data, wherein selecting the setof labeled data instances is based on a determination that re-training acurrent predictive model with updated training data likely will resultin improved model performance; generating a candidate model using atleast one candidate training data set generated based at least in parton a received training data set and the set of labeled data instances;in an instance in which a performance of the candidate model is improvedfrom a performance of the current predictive model, instantiating thecandidate training data set and the candidate model.
 28. The system ofclaim 27, wherein the labeled data reservoir comprises data that havebeen collected continuously over time from input data being processed bythe current predictive model.
 29. The system of claim 27, wherein theset of labeled data instances is not included in the received trainingdata set, and wherein each labeled data instance is associated with atrue label representing the data instance.
 30. The system of claim 29,wherein the determination is based at least in part on a distributionand quality of the training data.
 31. The system of claim 30, whereinthe current predictive model is a classifier predicting to which of aset of predictive categories an input data instance belongs, wherein atrue label associated with a labeled data instance identifies thepredictive category to which the labeled data instance belongs, andwherein selecting the set of labeled data instances from the labeleddata reservoir is based at least in part on maintaining a class balancewithin the training data.
 32. The system of claim 27, wherein generatingthe candidate training data comprises identifying and removing outlierinstances.
 33. The system of claim 32, wherein the current predictivemodel is a classifier predicting to which of a set of predictivecategories an input data instance belongs, and wherein selecting the setof labeled data instances from the labeled data reservoir comprisesidentifying and removing outlier instances in one predictive category.34. The system of claim 27, wherein the labeled data reservoir compriseslabeled data instances that are received from multiple sources, andwherein selecting a labeled data instance from the set of labeled datainstances comprises: selecting the labeled data instance in an instancein which a source of the labeled data instance matches with apre-determined source. 35-39. (canceled)